The framing of Hizbullah

Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, assistant professor of political science at the Lebanese-America University, has written a piece for The Guardian Unlimited which attempts to show the other side of the coin. Here are a few extracts:

The capture of three Israeli soldiers by the Lebanese resistance movement, Hizbullah, to bargain for prisoner exchange should come as no surprise – least of all to Israel, which must bear its own responsibility for the abductions and is using this conflict to pursue its wider strategic aims.

The prisoners Hizbullah wants released are hostages who were taken on Lebanese soil. In the successful prisoner exchange in 2004, Israel held on to three Lebanese detainees as bargaining chips and to keep the battle front with Hizbullah open. These detentions have become a cause celebre in Lebanon. In a recent poll, efforts to effect their release attracted majority support, much more even than the liberation of Shebaa Farms, the disputed corridor of land between Syria and Lebanon still occupied by Israel.

The regional significance of the abductions has also been misconstrued. To suggest Hizbullah attacked on the orders of Tehran and Damascus is to grossly oversimplify a strong strategic and ideological relationship. Historically there has been an overlap of interests between Syria, Iran, Hizbullah and Hamas. Together they form a strategic axis – the “axis of terror” to Israel – that confronts US-Israeli designs to redraw the map of the region.

Israel’s disproportionate response to the soldiers’ capture will have an impact on Lebanese domestic policy. Hizbullah has recently proposed a comprehensive national defence strategy; the Lebanese government has yet to come up with anything similarly convincing. If demands for a prisoner exchange are successful then it shows that what Hizbullah would term the logic of resistance is the most effective defence strategy. Israel’s escalation has been a poor PR exercise. Even if it succeeds in showing the Lebanese people that Hizbullah can be a liability, this may well be cancelled out by Israel’s own aggression, which will only confirm Hizbullah’s repeated warnings of the constant threat posed by Israel.

Click the headline for the full story.

make or read commentsCOMMENTS

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The framing of Hizbullah

  1. Ahmedinajad says:

    ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF ABRAHAM, MOSES, JESUS AND MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON THEM ALL).THINK ABOUT IT HOW COULD AN ILLITERATE MAN INSPIRE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AND 1400 YEARS LATER STILL BE HAVING AN EFFECT ON THE WORLD.WAKE UP FEAR THE GOD OF ISRAEL AND THE UNIVERSE.AS A WESTENER THE RATE OF ISLAMS INFLUENCE IS SKY ROCKETING ESPECIALLY IN EUROPE. SO STOP BURYING YOUR HEADS IN THE SAND (no pun intended) LIKE OSTRICHES.STOP DEMONISING THE FUTURE FAITH OF MANKIND.IF ISLAM IS AN ARAB RELIGION FOUNDED BY AN ARAB IT WOULD NOT HAVE SPREAD FURTHER THAN MECCA OR MEDINA.Visit the following websites for further information on ISLAM.http://www.al-sunnah.com/muhammad_in_the_bible.htm (MUHAMMAD IN THE BIBLE)http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/MB_BQS/default.htm (Quran and Science)http://www.harunyahya.com/http://www.barnabas.net/http://www.answering-christianity.com/ac.htmhttp://www.islamicity.com/http://www.islamonline.net/english/index.shtml

  2. Thank you for the web site links. I have begun to explore them. Very, very good stuff.As for me: I fear no god, I fear no religion, I fear no truth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s